BACKGROUND
Based on the resolutions of our Congress XXXIII Ordinary General and Academic Forum Resolutive emanated from the same Congress ratified the following considerations:
1. For a total rejection of his model RIEMSER and finish at the College of Bachelors: curriculum reform.
2. We claim the Bachelors School as an institution of Higher Secondary Education public, secular, free and a public agency of the State.
3. We reject and impugn improvised changes psychoeducational model of the College and its application from the undemocratic and handling vertical that has led to the detriment of education.
4. We reject totally the claim and challenged the authority of the College to implement a unilateral regulation, illegal, violates authoritarian collective bargaining agreement such as the Draft Statute of Academic Staff, Academic Staff Rules, Guidelines Group Assignment Vacancies and Hours, Guidelines for Mentoring, General Guidelines Concerning the Academic Personnel to Operate Curricular Reform and Gradual Addressing the unique Entry. Semester 2009B and Table of Professional Profiles for Academic Staff.
5. We are against the arbitrary application of the Guidelines for Assignment Hours Vacancy for staff in the Open Learning System.
6. Do not allow the downsizing of laboratorians.
7. Refuse to hire computer technicians or computer on campus to impersonate laboratorians.
8. Defender manuals and job profiles of academic and administrative workers.
9. Do not accept work experience virtual experimental subjects.
10. Full support for the reclassification of laboratorians.
11. Respect to the agreement of November 24, 2007 Clauses 4 and 7. The application of direct appeal to 224 million salary. Return to appointments and membership base group structure.
12. We reject the flexibility and versatility that the College has imposed Bachelors academic and administrative staff and led to the location and bursting to Strike for violations of our Collective Bargaining Agreement, specifically:
2. We claim the Bachelors School as an institution of Higher Secondary Education public, secular, free and a public agency of the State.
3. We reject and impugn improvised changes psychoeducational model of the College and its application from the undemocratic and handling vertical that has led to the detriment of education.
4. We reject totally the claim and challenged the authority of the College to implement a unilateral regulation, illegal, violates authoritarian collective bargaining agreement such as the Draft Statute of Academic Staff, Academic Staff Rules, Guidelines Group Assignment Vacancies and Hours, Guidelines for Mentoring, General Guidelines Concerning the Academic Personnel to Operate Curricular Reform and Gradual Addressing the unique Entry. Semester 2009B and Table of Professional Profiles for Academic Staff.
5. We are against the arbitrary application of the Guidelines for Assignment Hours Vacancy for staff in the Open Learning System.
6. Do not allow the downsizing of laboratorians.
7. Refuse to hire computer technicians or computer on campus to impersonate laboratorians.
8. Defender manuals and job profiles of academic and administrative workers.
9. Do not accept work experience virtual experimental subjects.
10. Full support for the reclassification of laboratorians.
11. Respect to the agreement of November 24, 2007 Clauses 4 and 7. The application of direct appeal to 224 million salary. Return to appointments and membership base group structure.
12. We reject the flexibility and versatility that the College has imposed Bachelors academic and administrative staff and led to the location and bursting to Strike for violations of our Collective Bargaining Agreement, specifically:
Schedule Change (violation of the Clause 15, Fracc. V; violation of clause 55, Fracc. IV, CCT), changing academic profile (violation of clause 57, Fracc. VIII CCT), changing roles (violation of clause 15, Fracc. III) group assignment and time (violation of the Hours and Allocation Guidelines issued unilaterally Groups by the College of Bachelors; violation of clause 80, CCT), unilateral imposition of the condition "time shift" in applying for licenses to teachers who have the appointment of class hours (violation of clause 15, Fracc. V; violation of clause 55, Fracc. IV, CCT), discretionary account to register for the Diploma of EMS and curricular validity for promotion and assignment of hours, (violation of clauses 79, 80 and 92), labor certification as a teacher of EMS additional requirement for the promotion and allocation of hours (violation of clauses 79, 80 and 92).
and demand:
a) That the authority to provide the following information:
know how SEP evaluates the teaching staff?
development and results of the process in English teachers to promote
What is the current character of the school who teaches the College of Bachelors?
give us the information requested in writing by letter dated November 12, 2009
b) The immediate repair of the following violations of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.
which effectively paying teachers on time stipulated maximum in the CCT, since in many cases have exceeded the period marked in the CCT.
it be done with the issue of appointments and no sign of absence of the teacher (a).
to respect the commitments made in the agreement of November 24, 2007 to consider only the highest category of each teacher.
Let us clarify and rectify the fact why unilaterally given the key 3098 CB IV teachers that change as time teachers and within the collective agreement that would correspond to the key 3092-B
Let us explain why there are different appointments on the staff of the mixing macrosalas administrative and academic functions.
must be respected commitment not to amend the requirements for admission to the institution as they have been contracting out of these (are being hired without qualifications, or an arbitrary profile and from the faculty affairs department). That
review and resolve the case of the teacher, Flora Isabel Arias Sánchez teacher with 22 years in the application being evaluated SEAD signing the appointment and hire another teacher outside the school.
which returns the subtraction of field work in the SEAD enrolled and the institution has contracted for UAM students to fulfill these functions.
to review and resolve the case of teachers Nancy and Ismael Flores del Valle Aguilera Cortés campus 13 which affected their rights in spite of having recourse to the Joint Committee on Schedule, then the 2 cases reported there was no request groups and groups in one case and to have the designation does not respect this and the other is assessed incorrectly.
To respect all the hours that have been issued as final and reached the top flight.
total rejection of the Draft Statute of the Faculty and therefore the joint commission monitoring, because it encourages the violation of the collective bargaining agreement and individual rights hinders the possibility of having more groups related to the current time by example, 5 or 10 years to 25 hours, not compatible with Article 39 of the Federal Labour Act, the affected are forced to resort to the same instances of the College who are both judge and jury.
must be respected bank 87.500 hours and groups that do not disappear. Correct
where he spent the next category and payments were made and then withdrew the category and payment.
Absolute respect to Article 39 of the CFT, which states that the working material can not be arbitrarily withheld (if after the deadline had been set that remains the subject of work, the relationship will be extended for all time to endure such circumstances is not observed for example in the so-called authority contingency groups).
Absolute respect to Article 72 of the LGE, according to teachers' participation in the construction of Curriculum.
to be respected more and schedules of teachers.
to regularize the appointments of teachers.
That additional ballots are removed (eg academic activities).
must be respected, the number of students agreed in the Convention of November 2007 (maximum 40 students).
not to lower the bank of hours, or groups, not on top of 28 hours. Respect Article 21 of the General Law of Education. It packs
hours of retired teachers and who, etc. communicate on a single issue, in order that teachers already part of the institution and may be the beneficiaries and completing his workload.
demand that the $ 224,000,000 of dollars authorized by the House of Representatives shall apply to the income equalization for both academic and administrative.
c) Discussion and agreement on the following proposals to improve the institutional educational work
To recognize and pay for the time spent to prepare classes, grade, etc. Restructuring
facilities (chairs, tables, blackboards, etc.). Under a college plan preventive and corrective maintenance. Provide the SEAD
adequate space to perform its advisory activities, as well as provide adequate material to perform them.
REVIVE THE ACADEMIES generating academic work between teachers and materials and building ACADEMY REPRESENTATIVES figure would be the teacher or teachers elected by academia as PARTICIPATION IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF PROGRAMS, PROJECTS REVIEW OF MEMBERS OF COMMISSIONS AND STATEMENTS FOR PROMOTION streamlined ACADEMIC POLICIES IN CAMPUS this is to build mechanisms TRUE ACADEMIC PARTICIPATION. Create
: AN ACADEMIC BUILDING COMMISSION TARGETS HAVE TO GO THE BUILDING SUCH EVALUATION "IN SITU" VALUE TO ALLOW THE CLARITY AND NON-ACADEMIC PRACTICE SCHEMES FROM TRUCKS, papery of meritocracy.
That the agreement is reached appears established that will not affect wage-category-time functions and staff profiles. That
laboratorians of school are teaching assistants and assistant to the image exists on the general status of the CB. Since
recognized educational research subjectivity teaching for improving learning, be involved in curriculum design has positive impacts that the design of educational policies requires the participation of stakeholders for feedback, professionalism and training that teachers are a priority, both parties declare that they are must relegate the teacher to the operational and should seek their participation in decision-making and to strengthen the theoretical and philosophical our institutional policies and not only guided by the economic.
a) That the authority to provide the following information:
know how SEP evaluates the teaching staff?
development and results of the process in English teachers to promote
What is the current character of the school who teaches the College of Bachelors?
give us the information requested in writing by letter dated November 12, 2009
b) The immediate repair of the following violations of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.
which effectively paying teachers on time stipulated maximum in the CCT, since in many cases have exceeded the period marked in the CCT.
it be done with the issue of appointments and no sign of absence of the teacher (a).
to respect the commitments made in the agreement of November 24, 2007 to consider only the highest category of each teacher.
Let us clarify and rectify the fact why unilaterally given the key 3098 CB IV teachers that change as time teachers and within the collective agreement that would correspond to the key 3092-B
Let us explain why there are different appointments on the staff of the mixing macrosalas administrative and academic functions.
must be respected commitment not to amend the requirements for admission to the institution as they have been contracting out of these (are being hired without qualifications, or an arbitrary profile and from the faculty affairs department). That
review and resolve the case of the teacher, Flora Isabel Arias Sánchez teacher with 22 years in the application being evaluated SEAD signing the appointment and hire another teacher outside the school.
which returns the subtraction of field work in the SEAD enrolled and the institution has contracted for UAM students to fulfill these functions.
to review and resolve the case of teachers Nancy and Ismael Flores del Valle Aguilera Cortés campus 13 which affected their rights in spite of having recourse to the Joint Committee on Schedule, then the 2 cases reported there was no request groups and groups in one case and to have the designation does not respect this and the other is assessed incorrectly.
To respect all the hours that have been issued as final and reached the top flight.
total rejection of the Draft Statute of the Faculty and therefore the joint commission monitoring, because it encourages the violation of the collective bargaining agreement and individual rights hinders the possibility of having more groups related to the current time by example, 5 or 10 years to 25 hours, not compatible with Article 39 of the Federal Labour Act, the affected are forced to resort to the same instances of the College who are both judge and jury.
must be respected bank 87.500 hours and groups that do not disappear. Correct
where he spent the next category and payments were made and then withdrew the category and payment.
Absolute respect to Article 39 of the CFT, which states that the working material can not be arbitrarily withheld (if after the deadline had been set that remains the subject of work, the relationship will be extended for all time to endure such circumstances is not observed for example in the so-called authority contingency groups).
Absolute respect to Article 72 of the LGE, according to teachers' participation in the construction of Curriculum.
to be respected more and schedules of teachers.
to regularize the appointments of teachers.
That additional ballots are removed (eg academic activities).
must be respected, the number of students agreed in the Convention of November 2007 (maximum 40 students).
not to lower the bank of hours, or groups, not on top of 28 hours. Respect Article 21 of the General Law of Education. It packs
hours of retired teachers and who, etc. communicate on a single issue, in order that teachers already part of the institution and may be the beneficiaries and completing his workload.
demand that the $ 224,000,000 of dollars authorized by the House of Representatives shall apply to the income equalization for both academic and administrative.
c) Discussion and agreement on the following proposals to improve the institutional educational work
To recognize and pay for the time spent to prepare classes, grade, etc. Restructuring
facilities (chairs, tables, blackboards, etc.). Under a college plan preventive and corrective maintenance. Provide the SEAD
adequate space to perform its advisory activities, as well as provide adequate material to perform them.
REVIVE THE ACADEMIES generating academic work between teachers and materials and building ACADEMY REPRESENTATIVES figure would be the teacher or teachers elected by academia as PARTICIPATION IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF PROGRAMS, PROJECTS REVIEW OF MEMBERS OF COMMISSIONS AND STATEMENTS FOR PROMOTION streamlined ACADEMIC POLICIES IN CAMPUS this is to build mechanisms TRUE ACADEMIC PARTICIPATION. Create
: AN ACADEMIC BUILDING COMMISSION TARGETS HAVE TO GO THE BUILDING SUCH EVALUATION "IN SITU" VALUE TO ALLOW THE CLARITY AND NON-ACADEMIC PRACTICE SCHEMES FROM TRUCKS, papery of meritocracy.
That the agreement is reached appears established that will not affect wage-category-time functions and staff profiles. That
laboratorians of school are teaching assistants and assistant to the image exists on the general status of the CB. Since
recognized educational research subjectivity teaching for improving learning, be involved in curriculum design has positive impacts that the design of educational policies requires the participation of stakeholders for feedback, professionalism and training that teachers are a priority, both parties declare that they are must relegate the teacher to the operational and should seek their participation in decision-making and to strengthen the theoretical and philosophical our institutional policies and not only guided by the economic.
academic committee
CGH NOVEMBER 16, 2009
CGH NOVEMBER 16, 2009
0 comments:
Post a Comment